ROBERT G. BRUCE AND NANCY K. BRUCE, APPELLANTS,
v.
STORK'S NEST, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, JEAN B. ENGLAND AND DOUGLAS ENGLAND, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the sublessees failed to prove damages on their counterclaim, as relocation expenses incurred after a lawful eviction are not recoverable.
Sublessors sued sublessees for rent. Sublessees counterclaimed for damages based on fraudulent misrepresentation, intentional interference, and wrongf…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intentional Interference With Advantageous Business Relationship cases and more on FLexlaw
DANAHY, Judge.
The Bruces sued for rents due them as sublessors of commercial property. In the amended final judgment before us, appel-lees, sublessees of the property, were awarded damages on their counterclaim. The Bruces contend that the trial court should have directed a verdict in their favor on the counterclaim. We agree and reverse.
Appellees’ counterclaim was founded on three theories: (1) fraudulent misrepresentation of the premises; (2) intentional interference with appellees’ business relationships; and (3) retaliatory and wrongful eviction. Each theory requires proof of damages. See Charter Air Center, Inc. v. Miller, 348 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 354 So. 2d 983 (Fla.1977); Nichols v. MoAmCo Corp., 311 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Berwick Corp. v. Kleinginna Investment Corp., 143 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). At trial, the only evidence of any damages suffered by appellees was the testimony of Douglas England that appellees had incurred $9,958 for relocation expenses. However, the Bruces presented unrebutted evidence showing that any such relocation expenses were only, incurred after a court order awarded them possession of the premises. Relocation expenses incurred after a lawful eviction may not be awarded as damages. Church of Scientology of California v. Wade, 358 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
Because they failed to prove damages on any of their theories, appellees did not establish a prima facie case. Hence, because there was no evidence upon which an award of damages could be entered in favor of appellees on their counterclaim, the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the Bruces. Accordingly, we reverse the amended final judgment and remand with directions to the trial court to enter a directed verdict and judgment for the Bruces on the counterclaim.
REVERSED AND REMANDED with instructions.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lebert F. Batten v. State, 591 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…he vending estate. The test of whether Batten’s conduct offended the Act is not, as we show below, dependent upon loss or other detriment, as might be the case in a common law or other statutory fraud setting. See, e.g., Bruce v. Stork’s Nest, Inc., 477 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The conclusion we have reached in this regard flows from the legislature’s grant to the judiciary of the freedom to utilize “legal precedent available under federal mail and wire fraud statutes.” § 817.034(l)(b). Fla. Stat. Befo…
Authorities Cited
- Berwick Corp. v. Kleinginna Inv. Corp., 143 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
- Charter AIR Ctr., Inc. v. Miller, 348 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
- Nichols v. MoAmCO Corp. & Silco Corp., 311 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Church OF Scientology OF Cal. v. Wade, 358 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)