PROCESS MASTERS, INC. AND GLENN OBST, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALPHA III LTD. PARTNERSHIP D/B/A PALM VILLA APARTMENTS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1985-10-30
No. BD-353
MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.
477 So. 2d 69 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court erred in denying a set off for a settlement received by the plaintiff for property damages, as prejudgment interest is an element of those damages.


Headnotes

[1] A claim for property damages resulting from a fire is a liquidated claim subject to prejudgment interest from the date of the loss.

[2] A court shall set off any settlement from the amount of a judgment if the plaintiff received partial satisfaction of the damages sued for.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Alpha III Ltd. sued Process Masters, Inc. and Glenn Obst for property damages from a fire. The trial court awarded prejudgment interest and denied a s…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an award of prejudgment interest and a denial of a set off from that judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Appellee Alpha III Ltd., d/b/a Palm Villa Apartments (Alpha III) brought a negligence action against appellants Process Masters, Inc. and Glenn Obst (Process Masters and Obst) for recovery of property damages that resulted from a fire. The trial court’s finding that this claim for damages was liquidated and subject to prejudgment interest from the date of the loss is affirmed. Argonaut Insurance Company v. May Plumbing Co., et al., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985).

Section 768.041(2), Fla.Stat. directs that a court shall set off any settlement from the amount of any judgment which the plaintiff was entitled to at the time of rendering judgment if the plaintiff has received a partial satisfaction of the damages sued for. The statute has been construed to authorize a set off “from a judgment against one joint tortfeasor only the amount constituting a settlement for the damages or damage elements recoverable in the same cause of action against another joint tortfeasor.” Devlin v. McMannis, 231 So. 2d 194, 196 (Fla.1970).

In the case at bar, Alpha III reached a settlement with a third party for property loss and property damages caused by the fire. The judgment entered against Process Masters and Obst was for prejudgment interest on a stipulated amount of damages caused by the fire. Prejudgment interest is merely an element of those damages. Argonaut at 212. There is no evidence in the record to support the trial court’s denial of the set off.

The order denying the set off is reversed and remanded. The amount of the interest judgment entered against Process Masters and Obst was $20,750.85. Therefore, the trial court shall apply $20,750.85 of the $35,000 settlement for property damages as a set off from the interest judgment entered against Process Masters and Obst.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded with directions.

MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Jacksonville v. Marva Wright Outlaw, 538 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …e award. The trial court erred in denying such setoff and failing to enter judgment in the amount of $0. See Scheib v. Florida Sanitarium and Benevolent Association, 759 F. 2d 859 (11th Cir.1985); Process Masters, Inc. v. Alpha III Ltd. Partnership, 477 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). In his order denying setoff the trial judge correctly held that an adjoining landowner cannot be held liable for the negligent maintenance of city sidewalks and that a municipality may not delegate its duty to keep the sidewalk…
  • YSC Fla., LLC v. Siegel (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw