HOWARD ELLIS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYEES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
HOWARD ELLIS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYEES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
736 F.2d 1340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This matter returns to us for consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1883, 80 L.Ed.2d 428 (1984). That decision affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands for further proceedings our judgment in 685 F. 2d 1065 (9th Cir.1982).
Therefore, we order that the previous judgments we entered in Nos. 80-5562 and 80-5603 be affirmed to the extent that they are consistent with the Court’s opinion, and we remand the defective portions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
-
State v. Barnett, 572 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
-
Eleuterio Benitez-Mendez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 752 F.2d 1309 (9th Cir. 1983)
Authorities Cited
- Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, 466 U.S. 435 (U.S. 1984)
- Ellis v. Brotherhood OF Railway, 685 F.2d 1065 (9th Cir. 1982)