JOHNNIE CARL KING, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Edwards v. Caulfield, 560 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …this case that claimant voluntarily limited her income by failing to conduct an adequate work search. However, claimant’s entitlement to wage-loss benefits is not automatically foreclosed. See Hills-borough County Employees Credit Union v. Tamargo, 477 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The work search requirement must be applied as an “evidentiary test for em-ployability,” and not as a condition precedent to any consideration of the merits of a wage loss claim. The work search test is merely the evidentiary ve…
• Doral Country Club & Prof'l Administrators, Inc. v. Gonzalez, 496 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …ability to earn wages during the last period of time to $67 per week. This second finding was based on the deputy’s consideration of physical restrictions, language problems, age, education, and job history. Hillsborough County Employees v. Tamargo, 477 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). We therefore affirm wage loss benefits for the three periods of time in question, and find no error with respect to the other issues raised by appellant. Affirmed. BOOTH, C.J., and MILLS and WENT-WORTH, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)