NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
FREEPORT INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
FREEPORT INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
478 So. 2d 93
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Coffman Realty, Inc. v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc., 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hall v. Tayze Wilson, 530 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…rt’s discretion. Cf. Smith v. Smith, 500 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (award of $80 per week child support was abuse of trial court’s discretion where only evidence concerning needs of children was $200 monthly day care expenditure); Bill v. Bill, 478 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (evidence insufficient to support award of $1,000 a month child support where evidence showed that child’s actual monthly expenses amounted to $230); Aycock v. Aycock, 433 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (trial court erred in award…
-
Smith v. Smith, 500 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…on would adopt the view taken by the trial court. Under these circumstances, there is no abuse of discretion.” The determination of the amount of child support is a matter of judicial discretion, subject to the test of reasonableness. Bill v. Bill, 478 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The factors to consider are the amounts reasonably necessary for the support of the minor children and the relative ability of each parent to contribute to that support. McLendon v. McLendon, 483 So. 2d 498, 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 198…
-
Lucinda Eudy Williams (Clayton) v. Williams, 553 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…tatus and ability of the noncustodial parent to meet such needs. The ability of the custodial spouse to provide for the needs of the children should also be taken into account. Peak v. Peak, 411 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). See also Bill v. Bill, 478 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Galligher v. Galligher, 527 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Since these factors were not considered until the date of the final hearing, and the record does not establish that all of the factors considered by the trial court were…
Authorities Cited
- Coffman Realty, Inc. v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc., 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1982)
- McArthur Breedlove v. State, 413 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1982)