GENE ANDREW AUSTAD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
HENRY RISLEY AND THOMAS SELLERS, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES, AND ATTORNEY GENERAL MIKE GREELY, ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT AND APPELLEE
GENE ANDREW AUSTAD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
HENRY RISLEY AND THOMAS SELLERS, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES, AND ATTORNEY GENERAL MIKE GREELY, ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT AND APPELLEE
743 F.2d 739
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case 739 F. 2d 428, be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Austad v. Risley, 761 F.2d 1348 (9th Cir. 1985)
-
Lasso v. Woodmen OF the World Life Ins. Co., Inc., 741 F.2d 1241 (10th Cir. 1984)
-
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. United Parcel Serv., 860 F.2d 372 (10th Cir. 1988)
Authorities Cited
- Austad v. Risley, 739 F.2d 428 (9th Cir. 1984)