LEVELLE CLAY, APPELLANT,
v.
CONSUMER PROGRAMS, INC., APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
LeVelle Clay brought this suit against his former employer, Consumer Programs, Inc., under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming racial discrimination. The District Court1 found that the defendant had not discriminated against Clay. Clay v. Consumer Programs, Inc., 576 F.Supp. 185 (E.D.Mo.1983). We have considered each of the arguments made on appeal by plaintiff and are not persuaded that any error of law has been committed, nor that the District Court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. The judgment is therefore affirmed on the basis of the District Court’s published opinion.
Affirmed.
. The Hon. Edward L. Filippine, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1990)
-
Arnaldo Jimenez Fuentes v. Honorable Jaime Torres Gaztambide, 807 F.2d 236 (1st Cir. 1986)
-
McCABE v. C.E. Sharrett, Jr., 12 F.3d 1558 (11th Cir. 1994)
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence