WAYNE JOHN EPPRECHT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-11-12
No. 84-493
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
478 So. 2d 450 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*451] PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463, 100 S.Ct. 1244, 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Maier, 378 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); State v. Stevens, 421 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (Schwartz, J., concurring). Cf. Paulson v. State, 257 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (fingerprints).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Beltran v. State, 530 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
    …of charges results in a per se reversal, the language has not always been so literally construed. While this court has flatly announced that where charges are misjoined, prejudice to the defendant is conclusively presumed, see, e.g., Essex v. State, 478 So. 2d 450 (Pla. 3d DCA 1985); Finlay v. State, 424 So. 2d 967 (Pla. 3d DCA 1983); McMullen v. State, 405 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Macklin v. State, 395 So. 2d 1219 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); see also Puhl v. State, 426 So. 2d 1226, 1227 (Pla. 4th DCA 1983) (not…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw