RICHARD V. MARTENSON, APPELLANT,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for attorneys' fees and expenses.
Richard V. Martenson sued for a redetermination of tax. The government failed to comply with informal consultation requirements before requesting admi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Collateral Order Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Richard V. Martenson filed suit in Tax Court for a redetermination of tax for 1979 and 1980. The government filed a formal request for admissions without complying with the informal consultation requirement of Odend’hal v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 400 (1980); International Air Conditioning Corp. v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 89 (1976); and Branerton Corp. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 691 (1974). Martenson sought and obtained a protective order, and then moved for attorneys’ fees and expenses. The court summarily denied the motion and a motion for reconsideration. This appeal followed.
Because the order denying costs and attorney fees for actions relating to the protective order was interlocutory and the case is still pending in the Tax Court, this Court lacks jurisdiction. Martenson argues that this Court has jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed.2d 1528 (1949), and more specifically White v. New Hampshire Dept. of Employment Security, 455 U.S. 445, 102 S.Ct. 1162, 71 L.Ed.2d 325 (1982); and Obin v. District No. 9, 651 F. 2d 574 (8th Cir.1981).
Martenson’s reliance on White and Obin is misplaced, however, because both involved the appealability of post-judgment orders determining attorneys’ fees. The denial of a prejudgment motion for costs and fees is a non-appealable interlocutory order. See e.g., Coleman v. Sherwood Medical Industries, 746 F. 2d 445 at 446-447 (8th Cir.1984). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 8th Cir.R. 12.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. Cassidy, 950 F.2d 381 (7th Cir. 1991)
Authorities Cited
- Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (U.S. 1949)
- White v. N.H. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 455 U.S. 445 (U.S. 1982)
- Obin v. Dist. NO. 9 OF THE Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, 651 F.2d 574 (8th Cir. 1981)
- Coleman v. Sherwood Med. Indus., 746 F.2d 445 (8th Cir. 1984)