SHEARSON LOEB RHOADES, INC., GERALD JONES AND ROY FINK, PLAINTIFFS/CROSSCLAIMANTS-APPELLEES,
v.
VICTOR FUENTES QUINARD AND ALMA L. FUENTES, DEFENDANTS/CROSS-DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; WAGER BAY, N.V., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. SHEARSON/AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; SHEARSON/AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC., CROSSCLAIMANT-APPELLEE, V. VICTOR FUENTES QUINARD, CROSSDEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the district court did not err in rendering a default judgment and dismissing the action due to the defendants' willful misconduct and disobedience of discovery orders. The appeals were deemed frivolous.
Two consolidated actions involving commodity futures trading accounts resulted in a default judgment and dismissal due to defendants' willful disobedi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Frivolous Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
This is a consolidated appeal of two actions involving commodity futures trading accounts. The facts which led to a default judgment against defendants in one action and the dismissal of the other arise out of the willful and deliberate disobedience of a discovery order, willful concealment of evidence, and attempted fabrication of false evidence.
The record demonstrates that the misconduct was so aggravated that the district court acted well within its discretion in rendering a default judgment against the defendants in action No. 83-6486. Fed.R. Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C); United States v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Co., 617 F. 2d 1365, 1369 (9th Cir.1980).
The court did not err in dismissing the action in No. 84-5523, either. The pretrial order confirmed the fact that the plaintiff in that action was bound by the acts of the defendants in No. 83-6486.
We also find that the appeals are frivolous because the arguments of error are wholly without merit. Double costs and attorney fees are therefore warranted. Fed.R.App.P. 38; Gattuso v. Pecorella, 733 F. 2d 709, 710 (9th Cir.1984).
It is therefore ordered:
1. The appeals in Nos. 83-6486 and 84-5523 are affirmed.
2. The appellees in both cases are awarded double costs against the appellants.
3. The appellees in both cases are awarded their attorney fees, the reasonable amounts of which are to be determined by affidavits to be filed within 20 days of the filing of this disposition. Appellants shall have 10 days to file a response.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
HAL Commodity Cycles Mgmt. Co. v. Riva Kirsh, 825 F.2d 1136 (7th Cir. 1987)
-
Haw. Carpenters' Tr. Funds v. Clarence Stone dba Maui Plastering Co., 794 F.2d 508 (9th Cir. 1986)
Authorities Cited
- In re The Complaint of the United States v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Ins. Co., Ltd., 617 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1980)
- Gattuso v. Pecorella, 733 F.2d 709 (9th Cir. 1984)