THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
GEORGE E. OLLINGER, III, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopted the referee's report and ordered a public reprimand for attorney misconduct.
An attorney, Ollinger, pleaded guilty to violating disciplinary rules before a referee appointed by the Florida Bar. The referee recommended a public …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disciplinary Rules cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Ollinger’s alleged misconduct. Ollinger tendered a guilty plea for consent judgment * acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1) and 3-104(C) and (D) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Ollinger be found guilty in accordance with his plea with the proviso that The Florida Bar will not be estopped from seeking further disciplinary sanctions against respondent should a grievance committee of The Florida Bar make a finding of probable cause based upon the results of the audit of respondent’s trust accounts and that he be given a public reprimand.
Neither side contest the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $492.00 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. *
We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Executive CAR & Truck Leasing, Inc., 494 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 1986)…of layering numerous insurance policies. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fowler, 480 So. 2d 1287 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Property and Life Insurance Co. v. Chicago Insurance Co., 479 So. 2d 114 (Fla.1985); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reliance Insurance Co., 478 So. 2d 1068 (Fla.1985). In Fowler and Maryland Casualty, we held that the insurer of the owner/lessor of the vehicle is responsible for the first $10,000 in damages, the amount of insurance the owner of a vehicle is required to maintain under the financial res…
-
Canal Ins. Co. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 489 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…of coverage pursuant to section 627.7263. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fowler, 480 So. 2d 1287 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Property & Life Insurance Co. v. Chicago Insurance Co., 479 So. 2d 114 (Fla.1985); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reliance Insurance Co., 478 So. 2d 1068 (Fla.1985); Quinlan Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Linnel, 484 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Next, to determine which party provides the second layer of coverage, we need look no further than the rules and regulations of the PSC which were in effect at…
-
Se. Fid. INS. Co. v. Cole, 493 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1986)…e must apply the law as set forth in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fowler, 480 So. 2d 1287 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Property and Life Insurance Co. v. Chicago Insurance Co., 479 So. 2d 114 (Fla.1985); and Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reliance Insurance Co., 478 So. 2d 1068 (Fla.1985), to the facts of this case. The insurer of the owner/lessor must provide the first $10,000 worth of coverage unless the owner/lessor has properly shifted the burden of primary insurance to the lessee pursuant to section 627.-7263, Florid…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence