EARL B. BRITT, M.D., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Record On Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s motion for an order that the record be transmitted is granted. The clerk for the agency shall forward the record on appeal on receipt of payment herein provided. The transcripts in question were on file with the clerk of the lower tribunal when the notice of appeal was filed; appellant therefore is not the “designating party” for purposes of assessing the costs of transcription. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(b)(1). The clerk shall impose charge of $2 per volume for the transcripts of the final hearing. Section 28.24, Florida Statutes (1983), as amended by Chapter 85-249, Laws of Florida (1985), and Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(d)(1)(A).
The motion to supplement the record on appeal with the transcript of the July 1, 1985, hearing before the Board of Medical Examiners is granted. Appellant shall have the supplemental record forwarded and filed in this cause within 15 days from the date of this order. SHIVERS, WENTWORTH and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE v. State, 538 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…the state is charged with constructive knowledge and possession of evidence held by other departments of the executive branch of Florida’s government for discovery purposes. See Antone v. State, 355 So. 2d 777 (Fla.1978); Robinson; State v. Alfonso, 478 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), review denied, 491 So. 2d 280 (Fla.1986). Therefore, possession of the test results by the FDLE is imputed to the state attorney, who had a duty to disclose them prior to trial. In light of the state’s discovery violation, the t…
-
State v. Maritsa Saldarriaga, 486 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…e sanctions imposed are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court and may not be disturbed on appeal unless no reasonable person would have imposed the sanctions in question. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla.1983); State v. Alfonso, 478 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). No abuse of the trial court’s discretion has been demonstrated. For these reasons, I would affirm.…
-
Henderson v. State, 745 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 1999)…te, 538 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).2 Consequently, as a general rule, “information within the possession of the police is considered to be in possession of the prosecution.” State v. Alfonso, 478 So. 2d 1119, 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). With that being so, it appears incongruous not to consider a law enforcement agency as the agent of the prosecution, “the State,” for purposes of a criminal [*324] defendant’s public records request. Henderson essentially…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence