STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DISTRICT 10, AND JOHN L. STOKESBERRY, DISTRICT 10 ADMINISTRATOR, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, A DIVISION OF KNIGHT-RIDDER NEWSPAPERS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND DAN RAY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a writ of mandamus ordering the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to disclose child abuse investigation records to The Miami Herald. The court held that section 415.51, Florida Statutes, unambiguously protects the confidentiality of all child abuse records regardless of whether the child is deceased or a parent is charged with murder.
Section 415.51 unambiguously mandates confidentiality of all child abuse records except as specifically authorized by statute, and this protection applies regardless of whether the child is deceased or a parent is charged with murder. The statutory language is plain and unambiguous and must be given its plain and obvious meaning without construction.
[1] Child abuse investigation records are confidential and exempt from public disclosure under Florida law, except as specifically authorized by statute.
[2] The plain and unambiguous language of a statute must be given its obvious meaning without resort to rules of statutory construction.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“all records concerning reports of child abuse or neglect, including reports made to the abuse registry and to local offices of the department and all records generated as a result of such reports, shall be confidential and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and shall not be disclosed except as specifically authorized by ss. 415.502-415.514.”
The statutory language establishing absolute confidentiality of child abuse records with limited exceptions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Miami Herald sought access to child abuse investigation records involving a deceased child whose parent was charged with murder. The Herald argued…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plain Meaning Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
[*159] PER CURIAM.
We reverse the final judgment granting a writ of mandamus ordering the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to permit The Miami Herald Publishing Company to inspect certain child abuse investigation records.
Section 415.51, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), provides in part:
415.51.Confidentiality of reports and records in cases of child abuse or neglect
(1) In order to protect the rights of the child and his parents or other persons responsible for the child’s welfare, all records concerning reports of child abuse or neglect, including reports made to the abuse registry and to local offices of the department and all records generated as a result of such reports, shall be confidential and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and shall not be disclosed except as specifically authorized by ss. 415.502-415.514.
HRS contends that the subject records should not be disclosed to The Miami Herald because such disclosure is not “specifically authorized” under section 415.51.The Miami Herald does not argue that such disclosure is “authorized.” Instead, The Miami Herald argues that the language of the statute (i.e., “In order to protect the rights of the child and his parents....”) does not apply to the facts of the instant case. The Miami Herald contends there are no rights to protect when the child is deceased and the parent responsible for the child’s welfare is charged with murder. We cannot agree. Such a conclusion would be contrary to the plain, unambiguous, and express wording of section 415.51.Rules of statutory construction should not be used to create doubt, only to remove it. State v. Egan, 287 So. 2d 1, 4 (Fla.1973). Where, as here, the language of a statute is plain, unambiguous, and clearly conveys a definite meaning, there is no need for construction. See Biddle v. State Beverage Department, 187 So. 2d 65, 67 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. dism., 194 So. 2d 623 (Fla.1966). Accordingly, section 415.51 should be given its plain and obvious meaning.
It appears that the legislature weighed the right of the public to know “everything” about specific instances of child abuse, against the importance of encouraging people to report such abuse and the chilling effect on reporting abuse that disclosure might engender. Although we are sympathetic to the arguments of The Miami Herald supporting public access, it is up to the legislature in this instance to provide it.
ANSTEAD, HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Lopez, 604 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…e of “unfounded” reports or the name of the person reporting child abuse or neglect without the reporter’s consent. See §§ 415.51(2), 415.51(10), Fla.Stat. (1991). Cf. State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Serv. v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 479 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (plain and obvious meaning of section 415.-51, Florida Statutes prevented disclosure of child abuse records to newspaper). I believe that under the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 98…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Egan, 287 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1973)
- Biddle v. State Bev. Dep't of Fla., 187 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)
- State Bev. Dep't of Fla. v. Biddle, 194 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 1966)
- Harrell v. Turner, 194 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 1966)