RAYMOND D. JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1985-11-15
No. 85-315
DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
479 So. 2d 162 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his sentence imposed on a plea of guilty to malicious mischief and burglary, and a plea of no contest to a charge of arson. He raises two issues on appeal, one relating to the state’s failure to preserve evidence against him and the other relating to the voluntariness of his pleas.

As to the first issue, we find that the defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating prejudice in accordance with the holding in Adams v. State, 367 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

As to the second issue, we note that the defendant has not made a prior motion to withdraw his plea. Therefore, we cannot reach the question of voluntariness on this appeal. Our decision is without prejudice to the defendant’s subsequent filing of a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 challenging the voluntariness of his pleas. Counts v. State, 376 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stewart v. State, 586 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …tate, 565 So. 2d 354, 355 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (“[M]any appeals from judgments and sentences entered upon pleas of guilty and nolo contendere without reservation do not present any justiciable issues and are subject to dismissal.”); Johnson v. State, 479 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (appellant’s failure to move to withdraw his pleas prior to appeal precluded appellate review of pleas). Accordingly, we dismiss the instant appeal. SMITH and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur. . The Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure para…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw