BART WIENER, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES H. POPE, CHARLES H. POPE AND ASSOCIATES, INC., AND TWO RIVERS ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLEES
BART WIENER, APPELLANT,
CHARLES H. POPE, CHARLES H. POPE AND ASSOCIATES, INC., AND TWO RIVERS ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLEES
479 So. 2d 320
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985)
Caution
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Bart Wiener, a broker, brought an action to recover his commission for brokering a mortgage loan. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss on the stated basis that “since the construction mortgage loan contemplated by the commitment was never actually closed, the [complaint] failed to state a cause of action.” This case is factually indistinguishable from S & D Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp., 310 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and we reverse on that authority-
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Ruiz, 495 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…nce the thrust of Glosson is clearly to prevent the introduction of testimony by the c.i. which may be tainted, if not perjured, as a result of his monetary interest in the outcome, State v. Perez, 493 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), these representations — by which, of course, the state is and will be strictly bound, Finney v. State, 420 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (Pearson, J., specially concurring); Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc., 368 So. 2d 1337 (Fl…1 / 2
-
Errol Henderson Moore v. State, 498 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)…the jury. In these circumstances, we find no merit in the appellant’s argument that his due process rights were violated. See also Lee v. State, 490 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Yolman v. State, 473 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). AFFIRMED. UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.…
-
Taylor v. State, 612 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…h use of concealed microphone); Lee v. State, 490 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), quashed on other grounds, 501 So. 2d 591 (Fla.1987) (informant paid after each drug purchase, [*630] fee not contingent upon a successful prosecution); State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (payment to informant contingent on the quantity of drugs seized and not on cooperation and trial testimony in the resulting criminal prosecution); Dodd v. State, 475 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 488 So. 2d 829 (Fla…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ila Knowles v. Knowles, 310 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)