DOUGLAS W. SHIVERS, APPELLANT,

v.

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• ACandS, Inc. v. Redd, 703 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …ant is entitled to a new trial. See Southern Trenching, Inc. v. Diago, 600 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Sledge v. Richards, 592 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); McFarlin v. Jack Eckerd Corp., 581 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Kline v. Belco, Ltd., 480 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Roberto v. Allstate Ins. Co., 457 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Gaiter v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 376 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). If during the proceedings below, trial counsel knew that Dr. Redd’s testimony was untruthful,…
• Colvin W. McDONALD v. Conlee Pickens, M.D., & Hodnette Med. Ctr. Clinic, P.A., 544 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …duce a different result. Alston v. Shiver, 105 So. 2d 785 (Fla.1958). Also, there may be cases where newly discovered evidence may warrant a new trial notwithstanding that the evidence goes only to the impeachment of a witness. Kline v. Belco, Ltd., 480 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1985). With respect to the due diligence requirement, Roberto v. Allstate Insurance Co., 457 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984) stands for the proposition that a party is not required to anticipate false testimony from the opposing party…
• Chuck v. City OF Homestead Police Dep't & Vill. of Pinecrest, 888 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
  …z not to be credible, the court was privileged to rule against him on his claim of ownership as well. See City of Coral Gables v. Blount, 116 Fla. 356, 156 So. 244 (1934); Anthony v. Douglas, 201 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Kline v. Belco, Ltd., 480 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Black’s Law Dictionary 620 (7th ed.1999) (falsus in uno doctrine). Such an analysis is not proper here, where (a) there was no triable issue on standing, and (b) the facts actually being adjudicated related to the ultimate issue…