AUTOMATED MEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 1985-07-18
No. 83-3014
767 F.2d 748 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1985) Caution
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The judgment previously entered by this Court, 722 F. 2d 1526 (11th Cir.1984), having been reversed by the Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2371, 85 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985), and the case having been “remanded for further proceedings consistent with” the opinion of the Court, it is now ordered that the appellant here, Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., may file a brief, if it is so advised, within 20 days from the receipt by it of this Order, addressing any claim it may wish to pursue at this time. It is also ordered that the appellees here, Hillsborough County, et al, may file a responsive brief within 20 days from the service on it of any brief by Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

  • Lightbourne v. Dugger, 829 F.2d 1012 (11th Cir. 1987)
    …Wainwright, 782 F. 2d 1521, 1524 (11th Cir.) cert, denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 313, 93 L.Ed.2d 287 (1986); Stevenson v. Newsome, 774 F. 2d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir. 1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1089,106 S.Ct. 1476, 89 L.Ed.2d 731 (1986); Ruffin v. Kemp, 767 F. 2d 748, 750 (11th Cir.1985). Petitioner argues that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer’s representation.10 The record reflects that Theophilus Carson was arrested for grand larceny on November 25, 1980. On February 2, 1981, Assi…
  • Oliver v. Louie L. Wainwright, 782 F.2d 1521 (11th Cir. 1986)
    …iderable doubt on the holding in Baty v. Balkcom that a petitioner need not demonstrate that the conflict had an adverse effect on counsel’s performance. Stevenson v. Newsome, 774 F. 2d 1558, 1562 (11th Cir.1985) (citations omitted); Ruffin v. Kemp, 767 F. 2d 748, 751 & n. 6 (11th Cir.1985).…
  • Stevenson v. Lanson Newsome, 774 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1985)
    …has cast considerable doubt upon the correctness of the holding in Baty v. Balkcom that a petitioner need not demonstrate that the conflict had an adverse effect on counsel’s performance to establish a sixth amendment violation. See Ruffin v. Kemp, 767 F. 2d 748, 751 & n. 6 (11th Cir.1985). Compare Burger v. Kemp, 753 F. 2d 930, 942 (11th Cir.1985) (Johnson, J., dissenting) (defendant must show that counsel actively represented conflicting interests and that actual conflict adversely affected counsel’s pe…

Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw