NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
C.R. ADAMS TRUCKING, INC., AND MICHAEL CATES, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the employer failed to meet its burden to show that the employees would have been discharged when the company converted to tri-axle vehicles.
Respondents C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., and Michael Cates contest a Board order awarding back pay to Bruce F. Pine and Robert Becker. Respondents argue…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Burden Of Proof On Employer cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Respondents C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., and Michael Cates contest the Board’s order awarding back pay to Bruce F. Pine and Robert Becker.1 The order awarded back pay to Pine for the period from September 11, 1979, to June 26, 1982, and stated that he was entitled to $17,462 with interest. Becker’s back pay award was $18,438 with interest, and it covered the period from September 11, 1979, to June 30,1982. Respondents argue in this appeal that Pine and Becker are not entitled to back pay past the Spring of 1980. They say that starting in the Spring of 1980, they switched from tandem trucks' to triaxle vehicles, and that tri-axles require driving experience that neither Becker nor Pine had.
The National Labor Relations Board adopted the ALJ’s recommended order. The AU found that driving a tri-axle vehicle is more difficult and more demanding than driving a tandem truck. The employer’s burden, however, is to show that Pine and Becker would have been discharged when the company converted exclusively to tri-axles. See NLRB v. Midwest Hanger Co., 550 F. 2d 1101, 1104-05 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830, 98 S.Ct. 112, 54 L.Ed.2d 90 (1977). The ALJ concluded that Adams and Cates had not met their burden, and substantial evidence supports his decision. The Board’s order is enforced.
. The Board’s order was entered on remand from our decision in NLRB v. C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., 718 F. 2d 869 (8th Cir.1983), holding that respondents had unlawfully discharged Pine and Becker. The Board’s order is reported at 272 NLRB No. 200 (November 27, 1984).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Aguinaga v. United Food & Commercial Workers Int'l Union, 993 F.2d 1463 (10th Cir. 1993)
Authorities Cited
- Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corp., 434 U.S. 830 (U.S. 1977)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Midwest Hanger Co. & Liberty Eng'g Corp., 550 F.2d 1101 (8th Cir. 1977)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C.R. Adams Trucking, Inc., 718 F.2d 869 (8th Cir. 1983)