ANTHONY J. COOPER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1985-12-30
No. BI-39
THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.
480 So. 2d 235 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s Motion for Correction of Sentence, based upon his assertion that the sentence violated the plea agreement, is AFFIRMED. The trial court has attached to its order the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings, which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief. Appellant may not in the future assert this ground in a motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lucien COQ v. Fuchs Baking Co. & GAB Bus. Servs., 507 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
    …Kahn found that the claimant had no dyspnea, and possessed normal pulmonary function, claimant was determined by Dr. Kahn to have no PI under the Guidelines.1 We regard the instant case as similar to Dayron Corporation & Claims Center v. Morehead, 480 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), where we sustained a finding that a machinist was permanently impaired, observing thát he would be 100-percent impaired if he worked with a new cutting oil, but would suffer no impairment if he avoided the oil. See also OBS Co.…
  • Dayron Corp. & the Claims Ctr. v. Morehead, 509 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1987)
    …PER CURIAM. We have for review Dayron Corp. v. Morehead, 480 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the district court of appeal certified the following as a question of great public importance: DO THE AMA GUIDES TO THE EVALUATION OF PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT APPLY AND PRECLUDE A [*931] PERMANENT EVALUATION RATING WHERE C…
  • …al disease is entitled to compensation even though he is not affected if he does not return to work under the conditions which cause his disability,” provided there is an economic loss. Dayron Corp. v. Morehead, 509 So. 2d 930, 932 (Fla.1987), aff'g 480 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings to assign a permanent impairment rating and to determine the extent of any economic loss resulting from Diaz’s permanent disability. We find the arguments raised on cro…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw