UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
STANLEY MILLS STANERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1985-08-28
No. 84-5128
Before GOODWIN, POOLE, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
769 F.2d 1410 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 64 cases

Opinion of the Court

The opinion in this case, which was filed June 5, 1985, 762 F. 2d 775, is amended by adding a footnote 1 at the end of the third full paragraph in Part III, at p. 780, beginning, “In his motion for an evidentiary hearing before the district judge____” Footnote 1 shall read:

The question whether a defendant has made a sufficient preliminary showing to entitle him to a Franks [v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)] hearing is reviewable de novo. United States v. Ritter, 752 F. 2d 435, 439 (9th Cir.1985).

As amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The mandate shall issue in accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 41(a).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (32 total)

Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw