F.Y. SCUTTI, A/K/A DALE SCUTTI, APPELLANT,
v.
DANIEL E. ADACHE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1986-01-08
No. 85-14
DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., and BARK-ETT, ROSEMARY, Associate Judge, concur.
480 So. 2d 718 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1986) Negative Treatment
Cited by 51 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is not ripe for review since no award for attorney’s fees has actually been entered. See Hurtado v. Hurtado, 407 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) and Vander slice v. Vanderslice, 396 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., and BARK-ETT, ROSEMARY, Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (26 total)

  • Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
    …t. We have held in other cases that orders granting attorney’s fees without determining amount are not ripe for appellate review. See Knight v. Mastrianni, 626 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Scutti v. Daniel E. Adache & Associates Architects, P.A., 480 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Hurtado v. Hurtado, 407 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Vanderslice v. Vanderslice, 396 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Appellant cites Blattman v. Williams Island Associates, Ltd., 592 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) which stat…
  • State v. McCALL, 524 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 1988)
    …t decision in Holden v. State, 487 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), stated that excessive use of force is not a valid reason for departure where death is the result of the criminal act for which the defendant was convicted. See also Hannah v. State, 480 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Factors already taken into account in calculating the guidelines score cannot support a departure sentence. Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla.1985). Accordingly, in the present case, to the extent the trial judge was consi…
  • Ellison v. State, 547 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …ne thing implies the exclusion of another: expressio unius est exclusio alterius. 49 Fla.Jur.2d Statutes § 126. Therefore, points for legal status at time of offense may not be assessed for an offender on “furlough status.” See also Hannah v. State, 480 So. 2d 718, 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We do not hold, however, that the trial court is barred from all consideration of Ellison’s “furlough status” on re-sentencing. Pursuant to Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we certify that thi…

Previewing 3 of 26 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw