INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND MONTWOOD INC., D/B/A WOODMONT COUNTRY CLUB, APPELLANTS,
v.
HAACK/CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/PLANNERS, INC., AND INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND MONTWOOD INC., D/B/A WOODMONT COUNTRY CLUB, APPELLANTS,
HAACK/CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS/PLANNERS, INC., AND INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
480 So. 2d 1335
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985)
Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Judge.
We find that the appellees are beneficiaries of the insurance policy purchased by the owners pursuant to the requirement of the construction contract between the owner and contractor. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment on the authority of U.S. Fire Insurance Company v. Norlin Industries, Inc., 428 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and Housing Investment Corporation v. Carris, 389 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), for the reasons set forth in the companion decision, Insurance Company of North America v. E.L. Nezelek, Inc., 480 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) issued simultaneously herewith.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hous. Inv. Corp. of Fla. v. Carris, 389 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Norlin Indus., Inc., 428 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- Ins. Co. OF N. Am. & United States Fire Ins. Co. v. E.L. Nezelek, Inc., 480 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)