BARNETT BANK OF THE KEYS, A STATE BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

ROBERT G. RANDALL AND BARBARA S. RANDALL, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Sargeant v. Mohammad Anwar Farid Al-Saleh, 137 So. 3d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …this section to subject property or property rights of any defendant to execution.” § 56.29(9), Fla. Stat. However, Florida courts do not have in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction over foreign property. See Paciocco v. Young, Stem & Tannenbaum, P.A., 481 So. 2d 39, 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (“A Florida trial court has no in rem jurisdiction over notes secured by mortgages on real property located in a foreign state....”); see also Rodriguez v. Smith, 673 So. 2d 559, 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (order requiring Miami p…
• Burns v. State, 147 So. 3d 95 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
  …Id. (citations omitted). “Florida courts do not have in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction over foreign property.” Sargeant v. Al-Saleh, 137 So. 3d 432, 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (citations omitted); see also Paciocco v. Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A, 481 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (“A Florida trial court has no in rem jurisdiction over notes secured by mortgages on real property located in a foreign state, to wit: New York”). In this case, because the bank accounts are located in foreign jurisdictions, the…
• Edelsten v. Mawardi, 137 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …nting him can confer, with authority to enable him to go into a foreign jurisdiction to take possession of the debtor’s property_”) (citations and internal quotations omitted) (alteration in original); cf. Paciocco v. Young, Stem & Tannenbaum, P.A., 481 So. 2d 39, 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (“A Florida trial court has no in rem jurisdiction over notes secured by mortgages on real property located in a foreign state .... ”). The trial court’s appointment of the Florida resident receiver to oversee an Ohio corpora…

Authorities Cited

• Indus. Supply Corp. & Fennell & Assocs., Inc. v. Bricker, 306 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)