UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
JOSEPH A. NAVARO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
JOSEPH A. NAVARO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
774 F.2d 565
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1985)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The sole issue raised on appeal is a claim that the district judge erred when he did not make findings of fact with regard to alleged inaccuracies in the presentence report. However, the district judge explicitly stated that he “did not consider [the] alleged inaccuracies” in his determination of the sentence to be imposed. He thus fully complied with the requirements of Rule 32(c)(3)(D)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and was not otherwise required to make findings with regard to the alleged inaccuracies. United States v. Ibarra, 737 F. 2d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1984).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Bermingham, 855 F.2d 925 (2d Cir. 1988)
-
United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774 (2d Cir. 1987)
-
United States v. Romano, 825 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1987)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1984)