GINA C. PYSZKA, APPELLANT,
v.
GERARD E. PYSZKA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-11-05
No. 85-199
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
481 So. 2d 486 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Gina Pyszka appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which awarded her $3,000 per month in permanent periodic alimony, one-half of the assets from the sale of designated properties after payment of all debts, including the mortgage on the marital home, and the marital home. The husband was awarded his partnership interest in his law firm and the assets remaining after all debts, including appellant’s attorney’s fees, are paid.

We have carefully studied the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in fashioning an equitable, if not perfect, award. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So. 2d 542 (Fla.1985); Walter v. Walter, 464 So. 2d 538 (Fla.1985); Mullins v. Mullins, 460 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Other

We modify the November 5, 1985 opinion to require appellee-husband to pay the income taxes on the award of permanent alimony. See Carroll v. Carroll, 471 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Otherwise rehearing is denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Galloway v. Josey, 507 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1987)
    …after departed from that state. Partly because of the language in Bailey, the Florida courts have shown considerable confusion in their approach to this issue. Under facts similar to those of the present case, the Third District in State v. Davila, 481 So. 2d 486, 492 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (on rehearing), held that a petitioner cannot defeat the governor’s warrant if the evidence “does no more than create a conflict ... on the question of his whereabouts [during the crime].” Earlier, that same court in State v.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw