MARVIN LEE HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARVIN LEE HILL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
481 So. 2d 995
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED on the authority of Clark v. State, 379 So,2d 97 (Fla.1979).
DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schellhammer v. Schellhammer, 687 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…ver, the final judgment does not provide that the award of permanent alimony must terminate upon the death of either of the parties or upon the remarriage of the wife. We modify the final judgment to include this limiting language. See Hunt v. Hunt, 481 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). The husband also contends that his actual child support obligation exceeds the child support guidelines set forth in section 61.30, Florida Statutes (1995), because the trial court failed to include in its calculation the amoun…
-
Paulk v. Paulk, 680 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Because the error can be corrected without a reversal, we modify the final judgment to require payment of alimony until the death of either party or the remarriage of the former wife. Hunt v. Hunt, 481 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Gold v. Gold, 417 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Affirmed as modified. BOOTH, JOANOS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.…
-
Torrealday v. Ascension Torrealday, 761 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…inal order that alimony would terminate upon the death of either party or remarriage of the wife. We therefore remand for modification of the final order to reflect such language. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Hunt v. Hunt, 481 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Affirmed; remanded with directions. GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 379 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1979)