GLORIA HARDING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals from an order revoking her probation and sentencing her to prison time. A brief has been filed by defense counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The defendant did not file a supplemental brief. There appears to be no reversible error in the proceedings below in which defendant’s probation was revoked. Brown v. State, 429 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
However, the order revoking probation incorrectly states that defendant pleaded guilty to the violation of probation. This should be corrected to show the defendant pleaded “not guilty.” Underwood v. State, 455 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
We therefore remand for the foregoing correction.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bocher v. Glass, 874 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…ng on the discrete issues and the evidence. During voir dire, plaintiffs’ counsel made comments that could have only been designed to ingratiate himself to the potential jurors and focus their attention on irrelevant matters. See Kelley v. Mutnich, 481 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (“[A]ttempts to curry favor with members of the jury are unprofessional and should be met by rebuke.”). Plaintiffs’ counsel identified himself as having a child apparently near the age of the decedent. The appellants unsucc…
-
Brumage v. Ritchie Plummer, D.O., 502 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…oduced. We therefore hold that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a mistrial on that ground. See Baptist Memorial Hosp., Inc. v. Bell, 384 So. 2d 145 (Fla.1980); State v. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1980); see also Kelley v. Mutnich, 481 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Honda Motor Co.; Decks, Inc. v. Nunez, 299 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 308 So. 2d 112 (Fla.1975). For these reasons, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this op…
-
Pier 66 Co. v. Poulos, 542 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…the cumulative impact. Admitting the evidence of the criminal contempt conviction was also error. E.g. Boshnack v. World Wide Rent-A-Car, Inc., 195 So. 2d 216 (Fla.1967); Eggers v. Phillips Hardware Co., 88 So. 2d 507 (Fla.1956); Kelley v. Mutnich, 481 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Granted, there is merit in appellee’s argument that the “door” to its admission had been opened by earlier testimony by Phillips’ in-house counsel that no one connected with the hotel had broken the law. That testimony, however,…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Brown v. State, 429 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- Underwood v. State, 455 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)