GEORGE PARISI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1986-01-29
No. 85-300
GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and HALL, JJ., concur.
481 So. 2d 1308 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1986)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the defendant's convictions and sentences, finding no merit to the appeal regarding the fire chief's testimony and declining to address the voluntariness of the pleas on direct appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant pled guilty to malicious mischief and burglary, and no contest to arson, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to exclu…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant George Parisi pled guilty to malicious mischief, and burglary. He also pled no contest to arson, reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to exclude the testimony of a fire chief who inspected the building which was the subject of that charge.

Defendant raises two points on appeal. First, he argues that the court erred in denying his motion to exclude the fire chief’s testimony. Second, he contends that his pleas to all three charges were involuntary.

We find no merit to defendant’s argument concerning the fire chief’s testi mony. Additionally, since defendant did not file a motion to withdraw his pleas, we are unable to address the voluntariness of those pleas on a direct appeal. Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979); Counts v. State, 376 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences without prejudice to his right to file a motion with the trial court under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 challenging the voluntariness of his pleas.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and HALL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw