EDDY PIQUION, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-02-04
No. 85-596
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.
482 So. 2d 541 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981); United States v. Williams, 728 F. 2d 1402 (11th Cir.1984); Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); State v. Valdes, 423 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Stiglitz v. State, 270 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sims v. State, 522 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
    …action contrary to the representations defendant had made earlier to the authorities. Defendant’s attempt to thwart an ongoing investigation can be rightfully considered an aggravating circumstance warranting an upward departure. Fernandez v. State, 482 So. 2d 541 (3 DCA 1986). 3. Defendant’s prior criminal record evinces a pattern of escalating criminal conduct. His prior juvenile record, which was not scored and therefore may be considered for this purpose, discloses early use and abuse of marijuana. His e…
  • Vanover v. State, 514 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
    …appellant was driving under the influence. This violates Rule 3.701(d)(ll). . The second reason for departure might be considered valid because destruction of evidence sought in an investigation is a valid reason for departure. Fernandez v. State, 482 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). However, the stealing of the automobile was not done to destroy evidence; it was done to leave the area. The incidental fact that appellant also took the bed sheets and attempted to dispose of them does not give the court a prope…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw