RICHARD PULLUM, PETITIONER,
v.
CINCINNATI, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
RICHARD PULLUM, PETITIONER,
CINCINNATI, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
482 So. 2d 1352
Florida Supreme Court (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of the Motion for Rehearing filed by attorney for petitioner and the Motion for Rehearing and Clarification filed by attorneys for Amicus Curiae, Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, and responses thereto,
IT IS ORDERED that said Motions be and the same are hereby denied.
BOYD, C.J., and McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Dissent
OVERTON, J.,
I find nothing new in the petition for rehearing; consequently, I am bound to deny rehearing even though I disagree with the majority opinion and would allow a claim to be brought within the four-year statute of limitations period if the cause of action accrued within the twelve-year period of the statute of repose.
ADKINS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Coggins v. Clark Equip. Co., 503 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)…summary judgment in a products liability case. The question is whether the statute of limitations (repose) bars recovery. § 95.031(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). The answer must be that it does. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So. 2d 657 (Fla.), reh’g den., 482 So. 2d 1352 (Fla.1985); American Lib. Ins. Co. v. West and Conyers, Architects & Engineers, 491 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Company, 500 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 198…
-
Armbrister v. Roland Int'l Corp., 667 F. Supp. 802 (M.D. Fla. 1987)