PETER R. JOHL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN H. JOHL, JANET P. JOHL WEISSMAN, AND ROBERT E. WEISSMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
PETER R. JOHL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
JOHN H. JOHL, JANET P. JOHL WEISSMAN, AND ROBERT E. WEISSMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
788 F.2d 75
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellant is a pro se litigant with a long record of frivolous and vexatious proceedings in this court. We have in the past imposed sanctions upon him for filing vexatious and frivolous motions or appeals. Johl v. Town of Groton, Dkt. No. 81-7569; Johl v. Moukwasher, Dkt. No. 81-7567; Johl v. Johl, Dkt. No. 81-7327; Johl v. Town of Groton, Dkt. No. 79-6257. The present appeal, taken from a wholly justified dismissal for failure to prosecute, is again frivolous and vexatious. We therefore affirm and impose damages in the amount of $2000 plus double costs. Rule 38, Fed.R.App.P. The clerk of this court is directed to accept no further papers from appellant on any matter until appellant provides the court with proof of compliance with the sanctions imposed in this case and in the prior cases cited above. Schiff v. Simon & Schuster, 766 F. 2d 61 (2nd Cir.1985).
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richardson Greenshields Sec., Inc. v. Mui-Hin LAU, 825 F.2d 647 (2d Cir. 1987)
-
Charles W. and Marlene D. Stelly v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 804 F.2d 868 (5th Cir. 1986)
-
Irwin A. Schiff v. United States, 919 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1990)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Irwin Schiff v. Simon & Schuster, 766 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1985)