CURTIS MICHAEL RICHENDOLLAR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
DIAMOND M DRILLING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE, AND BAKER SHIPYARDS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
CURTIS MICHAEL RICHENDOLLAR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT,
DIAMOND M DRILLING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE, AND BAKER SHIPYARDS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
790 F.2d 442
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
(Opinion March 5, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 784 F. 2d 580)
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gen. Trading Inc. v. Yale Materials Handling Corp., 119 F.3d 1485 (11th Cir. 1997)
-
Eldridge Lovelace v. Dall, 820 F.2d 223 (7th Cir. 1987)
-
DAY v. Persels & Assocs., LLC, 729 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2013)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Richendollar v. Diamond M Drilling Co., Inc., 784 F.2d 580 (5th Cir. 1986)