GARCIA FLEET CORPORATION, LTD., RENE GARCIA, AND NICOLAS GARCIA, APPELLANTS,
v.
LUIS MARTINEZ, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Asset Freeze cases and more on FLexlaw
[*503] PER CURIAM.
We agree with the appellants that the trial court erred in imposing the extreme sanctions of striking their pleadings and entering a default and, subsequently, entering an order freezing their assets for failure to make discovery. It is undisputed on this record that, when the trial court granted the appellants’ motion for protective order, Rene and Nicolas Garcia were on the high seas and unavailable to be renoticed for their depositions. The Garci-as did not have the ability to comply with the discovery orders, see Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A., 416 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (on motion for rehearing), and the appellee has not established that he was prejudiced in any way by the Garcias’ failure to comply. See Summit Chase Condominium Association v. Protean Investors, Inc., 421 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Santuoso v. McGrath & Associates, Inc., 385 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
The imposition of such severe sanctions under these circumstances was, therefore, an abuse of discretion. See Beaver Crane Service, Inc. v. National Surety Corp., 373 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Upon their return, the trial court should have granted the Garcias an additional opportunity to be deposed. See Summit Chase Condominium Association, 421 So. 2d at 564.
We accordingly reverse the order striking the pleadings and entering a default, and we remand for further proceedings. We likewise reverse the trial court’s order freezing all assets of the appellants since' there is nothing in this record which would justify such an order. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beauchamp v. Collins, 500 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…abused its discretion in dismissing the cause with prejudice. Wallraff v. T.G.I. Friday’s, Inc., 490 So. 2d 50 (Fla.1986); United Services Automobile Association v. Strasser, 492 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Garcia Fleet Corp., Ltd. v. Martinez, 483 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Beaver Crane Service, Inc. v. National Surety Corp., 373 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Dismissal of an action is a drastic remedy which should be used only in extreme situations and upon a showing of deliberate and contumacious d…
-
Abel Gomez-Bonilla v. Apollo Ship Chandlers, Inc., 650 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…overy orders. See Arviv, 528 So. 2d at 140 (finding that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the plaintiffs case where the plaintiff had no present means with which to comply with the discovery order); Garcia Fleet Corp. v. Martinez, 483 So. 2d 502, 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (holding that the trial court abused its discretion by entering a dismissal where the plaintiffs were at sea when the trial court granted its discovery order and were therefore unavailable to be re-noticed for their depositio…
Authorities Cited
- Santuoso v. McGRATH & Assocs., Inc., 385 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Summit Chase Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Protean Invs., Inc., 421 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Cummings v. S.C. Ins. Co., 373 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & FOX, M.D., P.A., 416 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)