GARDEN PROPERTIES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
PARKER'S MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1986-02-04
No. BG-411
SHIVERS, JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
483 So. 2d 759 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Neves v. Flannery, 149 So. 618 (Fla.1933).

SHIVERS, JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Fort Pierce v. Gloria and John H. Dickerson, 588 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
    …ight still be possible. If an improperly filed complaint is filed within the thirty-day time period required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c), a trial court can treat it as a petition for writ of certiorari. Reed v. City of Hollywood, 483 So. 2d 759, 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Therefore, we remand to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the Dicker-sons’ complaint was filed within thirty days of the rendition of the resolution. In conclusion, since the trial court lacked jurisdictio…
  • DeSMEDT v. The City OF N. Miami Beach, 591 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …P. 9.040(c), the mistaken complaint below should have been treated as an appropriate notice of appeal, see Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(c)(1)(A)2; City of [*1078] Deerfield Beach, 419 So. 2d at 624; Brickell, 393 So. 2d at 1197; see Reed v. City of Hollywood, 483 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Because the complaint was filed within thirty days of the city commission action sought to be reviewed, there is no jurisdictional impediment to this determination. Certiorari granted. . RULE 9.040 GENERAL PROVISIONS ** (c)…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw