UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
PATRICK ADIM OGUERI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the search of the defendant was valid as a search at the functional equivalent of the border and that his statements were voluntarily made after he initiated the conversation.
Defendant, a Nigerian citizen, arrived at Miami International Airport from Bolivia and was observed by a customs inspector. He was questioned and subs…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntary Statements cases and more on FLexlaw
HILL, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Patrick Ogueri appeals from his conviction of cocaine-related offenses, claiming that (1) his detention and search were illegal and (2) his statements should have been suppressed for being made involuntarily and without a knowing waiver of his rights.
Ogueri, a Nigerian citizen in the United States on a student visa, arrived at Miami International Airport from Bolivia on July 31, 1984. He proceeded through the customs enclosure without incident and walked to an airline counter approximately twenty yards away. While in customs, Ogueri was observed by Inspector Ellis. On the basis of his observations and experience in narcotics seizures, Ellis followed Ogueri outside the customs enclosure, approached him at the airlines counter, questioned him about his trip and finally asked him to return to the customs enclosure. There Ogueri was searched again and the agents located 661 grams of cocaine on his person.
Ogueri was advised of his Miranda rights and refused to waive them. Ogueri denied initiating any conversation and making any statements. Nevertheless, Inspector Lamelas testified that Ogueri asked him for help; Lamelas responded by saying that he could only report any cooperation by the appellant to the United States Attorney. Ogueri then made certain incriminatory statements.
1. The search, conducted after Ogueri had gone twenty yards beyond the customs enclosure, was valid as a search at the functional equivalent of the border. See, e.g., United States v. Ramos, 645 F. 2d 318, 320-21 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (search thirty minutes after defendant left customs enclosure and checked into airport hotel but had not gone to his room). This traveler had not been assimilated into the mainstream of domestic activity; the evidence is conclusive that the contraband he was carrying had crossed the border. 2. The trial judge did not err in finding that Ogueri’s statements were voluntarily made after he initiated the conversation.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Hendrieth, 922 F.2d 748 (11th Cir. 1991)…ht, 770 [*751] F. 2d 918 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 909, 107 S.Ct. 307, 93 L.Ed.2d 281 (1986), and statements voluntarily made by the defendant after he has invoked his Miranda rights are admissible against him. United States v. Ogueri, 798 F. 2d 452 (11th Cir.1986). When a defendant deliberately chooses to initiate or continue conversation, Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 103-06, 96 S.Ct. 321, 326-27, 46 L.Ed.2d 313, 321-22 (1975), the statements violate neither the Fifth Amendment right again…
-
United States v. Hill, 939 F.2d 934 (11th Cir. 1991)…ntains some, appeal, it does not comport with precedents applying the functional equivalent test. This circuit has upheld suspicionless searches at international airports even though the passenger had left the Customs area, United States v. Ogueri, 798 F. 2d 452 (11th Cir.1986), had proceeded to the baggage claim area, United States v. Santiago, 837 F. 2d 1545 (11th Cir.1988), or had been moving about the airport for thirty minutes after leaving the plane and had checked into an adjacent hotel, United State…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Ramos, 645 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1981)