INGRID O. DUCKWORTH, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL D. BROOKMAN AND BROOKMAN & BROOKMAN, P.C., AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Summary judgment for defendant in legal malpractice action affirmed because plaintiff suffered no compensable damages after the default judgment was set aside and she subsequently obtained a favorable settlement agreement.
A legal malpractice plaintiff who obtains relief from a default judgment and subsequently settles with favorable monetary terms has suffered no compensable legal damages.
[1] A legal malpractice plaintiff who obtains relief from a default judgment through a subsequent court order and thereafter settles with the opposing party on favorable term…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff's attorney's malpractice resulted in a default judgment in a marriage dissolution action that dissolved the marriage, awarded child custody …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Settlement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The final summary judgment entered below in favor of the defendant in this legal malpractice action is affirmed based on the following briefly stated legal analysis.
First, the claimed acts of legal malpractice resulted, without material dispute, in the entry of a default judgment in a marriage dissolution action against the plaintiff herein, Ingrid 0. Duckworth, the former wife.
Second, the default judgment was a limited one in that it simply dissolved the marriage between the parties — to which the plaintiff had no objection — awarded permanent custody of the parties’ minor children to the plaintiff’s former husband, and retained jurisdiction generally.
Third, the trial court, upon motion of the plaintiff, subsequently set aside the default judgment as to the child custody award, which order this court affirmed on appeal, Duckworth v. Duckworth, 414 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Fourth, the plaintiff subsequently entered into a voluntary settlement agreement with her former husband in which (a) she was given substantial monetary benefits, and (b) her former husband was given permanent custody of the parties’ minor children in accord with the prior default judgment.
Fifth, it has therefore been established below that the plaintiff suffered no compensable legal damages as a result of the claimed malpractice in this case, thereby fully justifying the entry of the summary judgment herein. Manner v. Goldstein Professional Association, 436 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Sixth, no compensable claim for fraud, intentional infliction of mental distress, or punitive damages was presented below.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. v. Ferguson, 556 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…. v. Winter Springs Community Evangelical Congregational Church, 509 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); McAllister v. Robbins, 542 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Crawford v. Miller, 542 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); and Prager v. Marks Brothers Co., 483 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). See also, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Marcotte, 553 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and Haynes v. Lloyd, 533 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). The order granting new trial is REVERSED. HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.…
-
Dandal Dampier v. Morgan Tire & Auto, LLC, 82 So. 3d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…occur when invitees walk on surfaces not designed for walking, such as planting beds. See City of Melbourne v. Dunn, 841 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Taylor v. Universal City Prop. Mgmt., 779 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Prager v. Marks Bros., 483 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). [*207] In Taylor, a woman twisted and injured her knee when she stepped on the edge of one of a series of tree planters running the length of a street at Universal Studios. A metal rim circled the cut-out for the planter. The pla…
-
Levy v. Home Depot, Inc., 518 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…olitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 392 So. 2d 911 (Fla.3d DCA) (slippery algae condition on boat launching ramp not so open and obvious as to relieve defendant of liability), rev. denied, 389 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.1980). But cf. Prager v. Marks Bros. Co., 483 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (unfinished flower box along curb of sidewalk did not represent dangerous condition for which warning was necessary). For the reasons stated, we reverse the summary final judgment in favor of Home Depot and remand for further pro…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Duckworth v. Ingrid O. Duckworth, 414 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Manner v. Goldstein Prof'l Ass'n, 436 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)