THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSE A. FERNANDEZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-03-11
No. 85-1271
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
484 So. 2d 639 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Moffett v. Wainwright, 512 F. 2d 496 (5th Cir.1975); Bailey v. State, 319 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Scotty Lamar POE v. IMC Phosphates MP, Inc., 885 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
    …elieve it to be a public highway.” Id. at 204-05. The Third and Fourth Districts have also approved the rule stated in section 367. See Hollywood Corporate Circle Assocs. v. Amato, 604 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Felton v. W. Gables Homes, Inc., 484 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Pursuant to the analysis in section 367 and this court’s decision in Drady, there were several genuine issues of material fact raised by the record. Initially, there was a question whether IMC knew or should have known that moto…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw