CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., APPELLANT,
v.
M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, HER ENGINES, BOILERS, ETC., AND UNITED STATES LINES, INC., APPELLEES
CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., APPELLANT,
M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, HER ENGINES, BOILERS, ETC., AND UNITED STATES LINES, INC., APPELLEES
804 F.2d 837
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1986)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
On rehearing of this appeal en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for reasons stated in the dissent to the superseded panel decision. See Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/V American Legend, 784 F. 2d 1161, 1166 (4th Cir.1986) (dissenting opinion).
Chief Judge Winter and Judge Ervin dissent and would reverse for reasons stated in the superseded opinion for the panel majority. See id. at 1162.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ins. Co. OF N. Am. v. M/V Ocean Lynx, 901 F.2d 934 (11th Cir. 1990)
-
Gen. Elec. Co. v. MV Nedlloyd, 817 F.2d 1022 (2d Cir. 1987)
-
Acwoo Int'l Steel Corp. v. Toko Kaiun Kaish, 840 F.2d 1284 (6th Cir. 1988)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/V Am. Legend, 784 F.2d 1161 (4th Cir. 1986)