MAURICE SIFRAN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF PIERRE RICHARD SIFRAN, A MINOR, DECEASED, AND ON BEHALF OF AND FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF MAURICE SIFRAN, SURVIVING FATHER OF THE DECEASED AND FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF ANACANE SIFRAN, SURVIVING MOTHER OF DECEASED, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AND CHESTER WRIGHT, APPELLEES
MAURICE SIFRAN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF PIERRE RICHARD SIFRAN, A MINOR, DECEASED, AND ON BEHALF OF AND FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF MAURICE SIFRAN, SURVIVING FATHER OF THE DECEASED AND FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF ANACANE SIFRAN, SURVIVING MOTHER OF DECEASED, APPELLANTS,
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AND CHESTER WRIGHT, APPELLEES
485 So. 2d 486
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Newby v. West Palm Beach Water Company, 47 So. 2d 527 (Fla.1950); Allen v. William P. McDonald Corp., 42 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1949); Adler v. Copeland, 105 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). See also Wood v. Camp, 284 So. 2d 691 (Fla.1973).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sure Snap Corp. & Elaine Shure v. Baena, 705 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…demonstrates that there is an amount of damages which the client would have recovered but for the attorney’s negligence. See Chipman v. Chonin, 597 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Davenport v. Stone, 528 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Kay v. Bricker, 485 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Accordingly, even though the jury found that Baena and the law firm were at fault for failing to preserve the underlying claims, they are not legally and/or financially liable to Mrs. Shure, since their alleged inaction did not…
-
D.R. Mead & Co. v. Cheshire OF Fla., Inc., 489 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…deed made the alleged misrepresentations and that, if they had not done so, Cheshire both would have secured an equivalent policy either from Pine Top or another carrier and would have been successful in an action on that policy. See Kay v. Bricker, 485 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Weiner v. Moreno, 271 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). After the trial judge struck the “defense” of arson and directed a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor on the damage issue to the effect that it had sustained at least $700,000 in…
-
Coopers & Lybrand v. Trs. of the Archdiocese of Miami/Diocese of ST. Petersburg Health & Welf. Plan, 536 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…requires baccalaureate degree in accounting plus additional semester hours in that field and, therefore, is a professional for purposes of professional malpractice statute of limitations). See, e.g., for attorney malpractice damages, Kay v. Bricker, 485 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Freeman v. Rubin, 318 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) (measure of damages based on attorney's negligence is amount client would have recovered but for attorney’s negligence). . Because we reverse that portion of the judgment which…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wood v. Camp, 284 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1973)
- Allen v. William P. McDonald Corp., 42 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1949)
- Newby v. W. Palm Beach Water Co., 47 So.2d 527 (Fla. 1950)
- Adler v. Mr. and Mrs. H. S. Copeland, Jr., 105 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)