S.E. BASTIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE E. BATCHELOR AND ALFREDO ZANATTI, APPELLEES
S.E. BASTIDA, APPELLANT,
GEORGE E. BATCHELOR AND ALFREDO ZANATTI, APPELLEES
485 So. 2d 494
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Govayra v. Straubel, 466 So. 2d 1065 (Fla.1985); Industrial Trucks of Florida, Inc. v. Gonzalez, 351 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
PS Cap., LLC v. Palm Springs Town Homes, LLC, 9 So. 3d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…vention after judgment (or as in this case, as final judgment is being entered) is extraordinary and disfavored. Rodriguez v. Fernwoods Condo. Ass’n #2, Inc., 957 So. 2d 1201, 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Econ. Dev. Corp. of Dade County, Inc. v. Turner, 485 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The intervenors argue that Wags Transportation System, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So. 2d 751 (Fla.1956), authorizes intervention when “the ends of justice require that it be granted.” In Wags, however, the proposed interven…
-
Rodriguez v. Fernwoods Condo. Ass'n # 2, Inc., 957 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…ing that an order granted simultaneously with a recusal order is void, unless “the trial judge’s written order ... was but a reduction of an earlier adverse oral ruling made prior to the recusal”); Economic Dev. Corp. of Dade County, Inc. v. Turner, 485 So. 2d 494, 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (quashing an order permitting intervention after judgment became final) (citing Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So. 2d 435, 436 (Fla.1969) (stating that “the general rule— universally — is that intervention may not be allowed after f…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Brannon, 351 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Aurora Pacheco and Ubaldo Pacheco v. Ramos, 351 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Govayra v. Straubel, 466 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1985)