SHEILA LEE, APPELLANT,
v.
HOLLYWOOD CAR & TRUCK RENTAL, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was applicable, creating a presumption of negligence that made a directed verdict inappropriate.
Plaintiff rented a car that caught fire seven days later, causing her severe burns. Plaintiff did not know the cause of the fire and did not contribut…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Negligence cases and more on FLexlaw
WALDEN, Judge.
Sheila Lee sued Hollywood Car and Truck Rental, Inc. for personal injuries suffered in an automobile fire. The trial court granted Hollywood Rental’s motion for directed verdict at the end of Ms. Lee’s case in chief because the cause of the fire was not proven. Ms. Lee appeals from the resulting judgment entered against her. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Ms. Lee rented a car from Hollywood Rental. Seven days later, while Ms. Lee was operating the vehicle upon a public street, it suddenly caught fire, beginning in the floorboard adjacent to the gas pedal. The car became completely engulfed in flames and was totally gutted. Ms. Lee suffered second and third degree burns, this being the injury for which she sued. Ms. Lee does not know how or why the fire started and the evidence is that she did nothing to cause or contribute to the fire.
We reverse because under the facts and circumstances of this case Ms. Lee, regardless that she had been in possession of the vehicle for seven days, was entitled to avail herself of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor. Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive Systems, Inc., 48 So. 2d 82 (Fla.1950). Such being the case there was a presumption of negligence on the part of Hollywood Rental which thereby made a directed verdict inappropriate. South Florida Hospital Corp. v. McCrea, 118 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1960); Marcano v. Puhalovich, 362 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive Sys., 48 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1950)
- Marcano v. Ante Puhalovich, 362 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
- S. Fla. Hosp. Corp. v. McCREA, 118 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1960)