SHERMAN COLLEGE OF STRAIGHT CHIROPRACTIC; STRAIGHT CHIROPRACTIC ACADEMIC STANDARDS ASSOCIATION, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
AMERICAN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, INC., THE COUNCIL ON CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION, INC., NATIONAL BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, AND SID E. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
SHERMAN COLLEGE OF STRAIGHT CHIROPRACTIC; STRAIGHT CHIROPRACTIC ACADEMIC STANDARDS ASSOCIATION, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
AMERICAN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, INC., THE COUNCIL ON CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION, INC., NATIONAL BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, AND SID E. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
813 F.2d 349
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1987)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Oral argument was heard in this case in Atlanta, Georgia on November 19, 1986. The record, briefs, and arguments of counsel have been carefully considered. The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the order of the Honorable Orinda D. Evans, dated and filed January 9, 1986, published as Sherman College v. American Chiropractic Association, Inc., 654 F.Supp. 716 (N.D.Ga.1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whitley v. United States, 170 F.3d 1061 (11th Cir. 1999)…or death resulting from combat service, see 28 U.S.C. § 2680(j), liability of the government under the FTCA for peacetime injuries to military members was a void that the Supreme Court filled with Feres and its progeny, see Pierce v. United States, 813 F. 2d 349, 351 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam). The Feres Court acknowledged that courts must determine "whether any claim is recognizable in law." Feres, 340 U.S. at 141, 71 S.Ct. at 157. "We review both questions of law and a district court's application of…
-
Kitowski v. United States, 931 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1991)…f injury is “incident to service.” These factors are “(1) the duty status of [*1529] the service member, (2) the place where the injury occurred, and (3) the activity the serviceman was engaged in at the time of the injury.” Pierce v. United States, 813 F. 2d 349, 353 (11th Cir.1987); Parker v. United States, 611 F. 2d 1007, 1013 (5th Cir.1980).1 In this case the district court held, “the undisputed facts establish that decedent was on active duty participating in training exercises at NAS when the fatal inj…
-
Elliott v. Elliott, 13 F.3d 1555 (11th Cir. 1994)…ay bring lawsuit for injuries suffered during surgery in a Veterans Administration hospital); Parker, 611 F. 2d 1007 (surviving widow may bring lawsuit for wrongful death of serviceman killed while driving on military base); Pierce v. United States, 813 F. 2d 349 (11th Cir.1987) (serviceman may maintain lawsuit for injuries incurred in motor vehicle collision with another serviceman). II. THE FERES DOCTRINE Although Congress chose not to expressly prohibit military personnel from suing for injuries incurre…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence