THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
JOHN MONTGOMERY GREENE, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
This case is before us upon the Court’s order to show cause why respondent, John Montgomery Greene, should not be held in contempt of this Court for failure to observe the conditions of the one-year period of bar-supervised probation which was imposed on respondent for the reasons set forth in The Florida Bar v. Greene, 463 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1985). Respondent has failed to respond to the order. The Court finds respondent, John Montgomery Greene, in contempt of court and hereby suspends him from the practice of law for 90 days, effective 30 days from the date this opinion becomes final.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDonald and EHRLICH, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (53 total)
-
Jaggers v. State, 536 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…statements, not subject to cross-exami [*325] nation at the time they are made, cannot constitute the sole evidence upon which to sustain appellant’s convictions of the sexual battery by penetration of his daughter and stepdaughter. State v. Moore, 485 So. 2d 1279 (Fla.1986). To hold otherwise would put us in conflict with Moore. Moreover, we do not find the intent of section 90.803(23) is to allow the state to breathe substantive reliability into such prior inconsistent statements when they are otherwise ad…1 / 2
-
State v. Green, 667 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 1995)…the victim made other prior inconsistent statements in this case that could be admitted at the trial under section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes (1989), the hearsay exception for statements made by child-abuse victims. Our decision in State v. Moore, 485 So. 2d 1279 (Fla.1986) (Moore II), is dispositive and requires a finding that this evidence, standing alone, is insufficient to convict Green. In Moore II, we held that, in a criminal prosecution, a prior inconsistent statement standing alone is insufficient a…
-
Tsavaris v. NCNB Nat'l Bank OF Fla. & Neofytos Theodore Tsangaris, 497 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…an appellate court may reweigh the evidence. However, that language in those [*1340] cases is dicta. Also, Hull relies upon Zinger which relies upon cases predating Tibbs. Affirmed. SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER, J., concur. . See also State v. Moore, 485 So. 2d 1279, 1282 (Fla.1986); Burr v. State, 466 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla.1985); W.S.L. v. State, 470 So. 2d 828, 829 (Fla.2d DCA 1985); Brate v. State, 469 So. 2d 790, 795 (Fla.2d DCA 1985); Robinson v. State, 462 So. 2d 471, 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); State v. Po…
Previewing 3 of 53 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 463 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 1985)