MARY ELLEN WICKHAM GIBSON HUBBARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STANLEY EUGENE HUBBARD, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Finding that the parties’ settlement agreement, incorporated within the Final Judgment [of] Dissolution of Marriage, provided for reduction of alimony on the occurrence of the former wife’s “remarriage,” (a term specifically defined to include the wife’s cohabitation), we affirm the post-judgment order pertaining to ar-rearages. See Mendel v. Mendel, 257 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Gale v. Rose, 455 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Adams v. Adams, 423 So. 2d 596, 598 n. 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Schwebke v. Schwebke, 347 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
de Clements v. de Clements, 662 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…an, 88 So. 2d 545 (Fla.1956); Kersh v. Kersh, 613 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Reali v. Velocci, 563 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), review denied, 576 So. 2d 294 (Fla.1991); Reece v. Reece, 449 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Landis v. Landis, 486 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Ben-Hain, 418 So. 2d at 1108; Sitomer v. Sitomer, 397 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Hemminger v. Hemminger, 391 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), review denied, 399 So. 2d 1143 (Fla.1981). Additionally, and in complement to the a…
-
Lelani Barrow v. Barrow, 563 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…f a master should be approved and adopted by a trial judge unless clearly erroneous, or it appears that the master has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence.” Bloom v. Bloom, 414 So. 2d 1153, 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Landis v. [*220] Landis, 486 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Linn v. Linn, 523 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 534 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1988); Sitomer v. Sitomer, 397 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The record does not reveal any error in the master’s fact findings; accordingly, the…
-
Millard B. Wright v. Wright, 516 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s order finding that the report of the general master is supported by competent evidence. See Landis v. Landis, 486 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“A trial court is bound by a master’s factual findings when they are supported by competent evidence.”); Shaw v. Shaw, 369 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (trial court must uphold master’s findings unless report was clearly erroneou…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Adams v. Adams, 423 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Mendel v. Mendel, 257 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Schwebke v. Aveline C. Schwebke, 347 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Gale v. Christiana Rose, 455 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)