PETER M. MACNAMARA, AS ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF ANNA M. WILLIAMS, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD TOUBY, AS ATTORNEY FOR THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANNA M. WILLIAMS, DECEASED, AND EDWARD P. SWAN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANNA M. WILLIAMS, DECEASED, APPELLEES
PETER M. MACNAMARA, AS ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF ANNA M. WILLIAMS, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
RICHARD TOUBY, AS ATTORNEY FOR THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANNA M. WILLIAMS, DECEASED, AND EDWARD P. SWAN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ANNA M. WILLIAMS, DECEASED, APPELLEES
486 So. 2d 32
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
A claim for guardianship fees not filed until six years after the guardianship terminated with the death of the ward is barred by section 733.702(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), which requires that a claim against an estate that arose before the death of the decedent be presented within three years where no notice of administration is published.
The order awarding guardianship fees is REVERSED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Baptist Hosp., Inc. v. State, 500 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…have recognized that competing health care facilities within the same service area have the right to intervene as third parties.” 484 So. 2d at 1294. And in St. Francis Parkside Lodge of Tampa Bay v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 486 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), the court reiterated that duplication of services with an attendant increase in the cost of delivery of health care services constitutes that substantial interest of an existing health care facility in the same service area whic…
-
FT. Myers Real Est. Holdings, LLC v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 53 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…76,1078 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (explaining that the question of whether a party has standing is different from the question of whether the party will be able to prove its case); St. Francis Parkside Lodge of Tampa Bay v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Sens., 486 So. 2d 32, 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (explaining that, at the dismissal stage, the factual allegations in the petition must be accepted as true). Finally, we have not overlooked the Division’s argument that this case is moot based on the recent changes in the l…
-
Psychiatric Insts. OF Am., Inc. v. Dep't OF Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 491 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…3) both facilities will be competing for the same staff and physicians. The existence of different bed need methodology rules does not control standing. See St. Francis Parkside Lodge of Tampa Bay v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 486 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Although we have determined that standing was erroneously denied, PIO was in fact allowed to fully participate in the administrative process including the hearing below. The erroneous determination regarding PIO’s standing was…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence