CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumptive Guidelines Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation and asks that his sentence be clarified to reflect that it was not a sentence under the sentencing guidelines.
We affirm the revocation of probation. Contrary to defendant’s argument, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence on the basis of which to revoke defendant’s probation. See Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1974).
We see no need to remand for clarification that the sentence was not a guidelines sentence. Although the trial judge at sentencing did refer to the presumptive guide- . lines sentence, the offense was committed prior to the adoption of the sentencing guidelines, defendant did not select guidelines sentencing, and no guidelines score-sheet is in the record.
Affirmed.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAÑ and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Home Fuel OIL Co. v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Irene F. Castle, 494 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…y another requirement to become qualified. The statute requires that she must not have left voluntarily without good cause attributable to [her] employer. § 443.101(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985). Department of Air Force v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 486 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). If we accept the hearing officer’s legal conclusion that when an employer decides to sell his interest or transfer control in a business he automatically discharges all his employees who decide not to continue their employment w…
-
Hall v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Laro, 697 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…ot be disqualified from receiving benefits, because it cannot be said that she left her employment without good cause attributable to the employer. She attempts to distinguish cases such as Department of Air Force v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 486 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), wherein this court held that a wife should be disqualified from receiving benefits based on her decision to quit her job in order to relocate with her husband who had been transferred to another state, because her reason was per…
-
Roges Adain v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 523 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…the employer, another innocent party, if the employer objected. Id. at 334. See also School Bd. of Lee County v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 500 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Department of Air Force v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 486 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Paschal v. Florida Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 405 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 412 So. 2d 468 (Fla.1982). While appellant would have us base a decision in his favor on Parker v. Department of Labor & Em…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gideon Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1974)