HENRY C. MEYER, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; MARY ELLEN JENKINS, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; ANONA BELISLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
HENRY C. MEYER, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; MARY ELLEN JENKINS, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; ANONA BELISLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
820 F.2d 329
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1987)
Caution
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
The district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment is vacated.* The case is remanded for the district court to determine whether the actions are timely under Davis v. Moran, 112 Idaho 703, 735 P. 2d 1014 (1987) and, if not, whether the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 9658 are applicable.
*
The district court’s opinion appears at 643 F.Supp. 17 (D.Idaho 1985).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alva Gutierrez v. Mun. Court OF the Se. Jud. Dist., 838 F.2d 1031 (9th Cir. 1988)
-
Chauncey Marvin Holt v. Castaneda, 832 F.2d 123 (9th Cir. 1987)
-
Crooks v. Maynard, 913 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1990)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence