ROBERT E. MOORE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
ROBERT E. MOORE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
104 Fla. 103
Florida Supreme Court (1932)
Caution
Also reported at: 139 So. 187
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of is judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
State ex rel. T. v. Buckwalter, 112 Fla. 200 (Fla. 1933)…e, in this general connection, Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Baltimore Equitable Society, 226 U. S. 455, 57 L. Ed. 297, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 167; Note to case of Douglas v. Loftus, (Kan.) L. R. A. 1915-B, 797, 806, et seq.; State ex rel. Gillespie v. Thursby, 104 Fla. 103, 139 So. 372; State ex rel. East Side Bank v. Holloway, 105 Fla. 616, 142 So. 221 Morris, Mather & Co. v. Port of Astoria, 141 Ore. 215, 15 Pac. Rep. (2d) 385; Dillon on Munic. Corp. (5th ed.) Sec. 893; 10 R. C. L. 381; 38 C. J. 546-550; 21 C. J., s…
-
State v. Baskin, 111 Fla. 667 (Fla. 1933)…v. State, 108 Fla. 92, 145 Sou. Rep. 858. In the case of State v. Mitchell, supra, this Court distinguished the previous decisions in State ex rel. East Side Bank v. Holloway, 105 Fla. 616, 142 Sou. Rep. 221, and State ex rel. Gillespie v. Thursby, 104 Fla. 103, 140 Sou. Rep. 775, and pointed out why such holdings were not applicable to a case like that now before us, which is no different in principle from the status of things presented in State ex rel. Aldrich v. Mitchell, supra, wherein we held the issu…
-
Bronson v. The Bd. of Pub. Instruction for the Cnty. of Osceola, 108 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1933)…would result in confusion and disorder and will produce an injury to the public which outweighs the individual right of the complainant to have the relief he seeks. Gwynn v. Hardee, 92 Fla. 543, 110 Sou. Rep. 343; State ex rel. Gillespie v. Thursby, 104 Fla. 103, 139 Sou. Rep. 372. We therefore affirm the order appealed from but without prejudice of the right of complainants, as Trustees of Special Tax School District No. 9, Osceola County, to seek appropriate relief by mandamus, or otherwise, to require t…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence