PHILIP LANDRY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
JUDGE J. ROBERT HOEPFNER AND WILLIAM GUSTE, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
PHILIP LANDRY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
JUDGE J. ROBERT HOEPFNER AND WILLIAM GUSTE, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
822 F.2d 510
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
(Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F. 2d 1169)
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., 818 F.2d 1169 (5th Cir. 1987)
Authorities Cited
- Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., 818 F.2d 1169 (5th Cir. 1987)