UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF CUSTOM FABRICATORS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DICK OLSON CONSTRUCTORS, INC., FORMICOVE, INC., AND ST. PAUL PROPERTY & LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a party suing under the Miller Act in the name of the United States is entitled to the 60-day period for filing a notice of appeal.
Custom Fabricators sued Formicove under the Miller Act for unpaid subcontract amounts. The district court entered judgment, and Custom Fabricators fil…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Rule Of Appellate Procedure 4(A)(1) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant the United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Custom Fabricators, Inc., brought this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270b, alleging that appellee Formicove, Inc. failed to pay monies owed Custom Fabricators on a subcontract for supply of cabinets and countertops on an Air Force contract held by Formicove.
The district court entered judgment against Custom Fabricators on July 15,1986. Custom Fabricators filed its notice of appeal on August 22, 1986, 38 days later. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1) provides that a notice of appeal must be filed “within 30 days of the entry of the judgment or order appealed from; but if the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party, the notice of appeal may be filed by any party within 60 days of such entry.” The question here is whether Custom Fabricators, Inc., who under the Miller Act is required to sue in the name of the United States, is entitled to the 60 day time limit or is limited to the 30 day time limit for the filing of a notice of appeal.
We agree with the Tenth Circuit in Barnard-Curtiss Co. v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of D.W. Falls Construction Co., 252 F. 2d 94 (10th Cir.1958) that the 60 day time limit applies. Accordingly, the order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction is discharged. This matter is deemed ready for calendaring for disposition on the merits.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Barnard-Curtiss Co. & The Seaboard Sur. Co. v. United States, 252 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1958)